Nov 22, 2024

20th Television to Face Trial Over Alleged Religious Discrimination in COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case

by Bridget Luckey | Mar 11, 2024
A man with a serious expression appearing in a scene from a dramatic television series. Photo Source: Jack Zeman/Fox/Everett Collection via The Hollywood Reporter

U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee ruled that 20th Television must proceed to trial over allegations of religious discrimination against Rockmond Dunbar, a former cast member of the popular TV series "911." Dunbar was terminated after refusing the COVID-19 vaccine on religious grounds, marking a significant moment in the ongoing debate over vaccine mandates in the workplace.

Dunbar, who cited his beliefs as a follower of the Church of Universal Wisdom in refusing the vaccine, argued that 20th Television's refusal to grant him a religious exemption constituted discrimination. Judge Gee's ruling emphasizes the need to explore whether Dunbar's religious beliefs were sincerely held and if reasonable accommodations could have been made by the studio to allow him to continue his role on "911" without compromising the safety of others or imposing undue hardship on the production.

This case is the second of its kind to signal a potential trial over terminations related to vaccine mandates. It highlights the complex interplay between public health measures and individual religious freedoms. The trial will scrutinize the studio's actions and the broader implications for how employers navigate exemptions to vaccine mandates.

The controversy began when Disney, which owns 20th Television, denied Dunbar's exemption request, questioning the authenticity of his religious beliefs. This decision aligns with similar challenges faced by other employees across different industries, where the sincerity of religious beliefs and the legitimacy of religious institutions have been under scrutiny.

The forthcoming trial will determine the legality of Dunbar's termination and set a precedent for how studios and other employers address religious exemptions in the context of vaccine mandates. With the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, this case underscores the tensions between maintaining workplace safety and respecting individual religious convictions.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Bridget Luckey
Bridget Luckey
Bridget studied Communications and Marketing at California State University, Long Beach. She also has experience in the live music events industry, which has allowed her to travel to festivals around the world. During this period, she acquired valuable expertise in branding, marketing, event planning, and public relations.

Related Articles

SAG-AFTRA logo displayed on a building exterior.
SAG-AFTRA Prevails in Legal Battle Over COVID Safety Guidelines

As reported by The Hollywood Reporter, SAG-AFTRA has successfully defended against a series of lawsuits challenging its COVID-19 safety protocols, which included mandates for vaccination, testing, masking, and quarantining. The lawsuits, filed by various union members, were dismissed by U.S. District Judge Josephine Staton on Thursday evening. The lawsuits, numbering... Read More »