After 34 Years, Benjamin Spencer Exonerated for 1988 Murder Conviction

After 34 Years, Benjamin Spencer Exonerated for 1988 Murder Conviction Photo Source: Shaun Rabb via fox4news.com

Benjamin Spencer, who spent 34 years behind bars for a crime he always insisted he did not commit, has been exonerated and cleared of all charges. The exoneration marks the end of a decades-long battle to prove his innocence, culminating in a Texas courtroom filled with supporters who erupted in cheers as Spencer’s wrongful conviction was officially overturned.

Spencer, a Black man from a poor neighborhood in West Dallas, was convicted in 1988 for the murder and robbery of a white business executive, a crime for which he received a life sentence. Throughout his imprisonment, Spencer maintained his innocence, refusing to seek parole because it would have required him to falsely admit guilt.

In the U.S. criminal justice system, parole is a conditional release from prison that allows inmates to serve the remainder of their sentences under supervision in the community. However, for many inmates, particularly those convicted of serious offenses like murder, obtaining parole often requires an admission of guilt. This presents a significant moral and legal dilemma for individuals like Benjamin Spencer, who maintain their innocence.

Spencer’s story, chronicled in the book Bringing Ben Home by former NPR reporter Barbara Bradley Hagerty, illustrates the deep flaws in the criminal justice system. Hagerty's work, along with that of legal advocates and journalists, helped bring national attention to Spencer’s case. A critical re-investigation ordered by John Creuzot, Dallas district Attorney, revealed significant doubts about the original witness testimony and police work that led to Spencer’s conviction.

Spencer's wrongful conviction was heavily influenced by prosecutorial misconduct, as highlighted by Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot. Key prosecution witnesses, including a jailhouse informant who was seeking leniency for his own charges, provided false testimony that was instrumental in securing Spencer’s conviction. Additionally, prosecutors at the time failed to disclose critical evidence to Spencer’s defense team—evidence that included fingerprints, which could have excluded him from the crime scene.

This failure to disclose exculpatory evidence, coupled with the false testimony, led to a significant violation of Spencer's constitutional rights. It wasn’t until the Dallas County District Attorney's Office re-examined the case in 2021 that these issues were brought to light, leading to Spencer's release on bond. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ultimately overturned Spencer's conviction earlier this year, recognizing the grave injustices that had occurred during his original trial.

Spencer's exoneration places him among the top 60 longest-serving inmates to be declared innocent in the United States, according to data from The National Registry of Exonerations. Under Texas law, Spencer is now eligible for compensation, which could amount to a lump sum payment of up to $80,000 for each year he was wrongfully incarcerated, along with an annuity.

“This day has been a long time coming. I am relieved and humbled to help correct this injustice,” Creuzot commented.

The road to exoneration was fraught with challenges. In 2008, a judge recommended a new trial, but it would take another 13 years for Spencer to be freed. A major turning point came in 2018 when Hagerty, alongside a private investigator, published a report in The Atlantic casting serious doubt on the evidence used to convict Spencer.

Reflecting on his exoneration, Spencer described the moment as deeply meaningful. "To have them acknowledge that in such a powerful and mighty way and to proclaim it before the world, it meant a lot," Spencer said in an interview with NPR. Now 60 years old, Spencer is beginning to rebuild his life and reconnect with his 37-year-old son, whom he barely knew while imprisoned.

Spencer's unwavering commitment to the truth, even at the cost of his freedom, is a powerful testament to his character. "The truth has always been more important to me than my freedom," he said, explaining why he never sought parole. His advice to others wrongfully imprisoned is to "always hold on to hope," drawing strength from his faith and the belief that justice can prevail.

Lawrence J. Tjan
Lawrence J. Tjan
Lawrence is an attorney with experience in corporate and general business law, complemented by a background in law practice management. His litigation expertise spans complex issues such as antitrust, bad faith, and medical malpractice. On the transactional side, Lawrence has handled buy-sell agreements, Reg D disclosures, and stock option plans, bringing a practical and informed approach to each matter. Lawrence is the founder and CEO of Law Commentary.
Legal Blogs (Sponsored)