A federal appeals court has unanimously ruled that Donald Trump is not immune from criminal prosecution for his alleged efforts to reverse his loss in the 2020 presidential election. Trump's argument that his status as president at the time of the alleged crimes shielded him from charges was flatly rejected by the three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Presidential immunity refers to the legal principle that protects sitting presidents from certain civil and criminal lawsuits while they are in office. This immunity is based on the separation of powers doctrine and aims to prevent distractions and harassment that could impede the president's ability to carry out their duties effectively. However, the extent and scope of presidential immunity are subject to interpretation, and it does not shield presidents from impeachment or legal investigation after leaving office.
The appeals panel dismissed Trump's immunity claim, stating that as a former president, he is subject to prosecution like any other citizen. Trump's legal team's arguments for immunity were rejected both categorically and in the context of the specific case. This decision paves the way for Trump to stand trial before the upcoming November election.
Trump's campaign spokesman criticized the ruling, arguing that without complete presidential immunity, future ex-presidents could face immediate indictment by opposing parties upon leaving office. However, the Department of Justice special counsel, Jack Smith, maintains that Trump's prosecution is constitutional and necessary for upholding the rule of law. Trump has pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against him.
In response to the ruling, Trump has indicated his intention to appeal to the Supreme Court "in an effort to safeguard the presidency and the Constitution."
Donald Trump’s victory over Vice President Kamala Harris in Tuesday’s election could significantly impact the federal and state criminal cases he faces, potentially putting the federal prosecutions on hold and ending them entirely. Special counsel Jack Smith is reportedly assessing how to proceed with the cases, given the Justice Department’s... Read More »
In the federal criminal case against Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, prosecutors have filed a superseding indictment after the U.S. Supreme Court granted Trump substantial immunity from prosecution for certain actions during his presidency. The new indictment, presented to a fresh grand jury that had not previously heard evidence... Read More »
In a decision on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a setback to the prosecution of former President Donald Trump on charges related to his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. The court's 6-3 ruling granted former presidents sweeping immunity for their official acts while in office, potentially... Read More »
Two lawsuits accused President Trump of violating the emoluments clauses of the Constitution by making profits from his New York and Washington hotels and restaurants. Monday, the Supreme Court declined to hear Trump’s request to consider the lower-court orders. Those orders had said the lawsuits could go forward on the... Read More »
