Canadian seafood giant Cooke Inc. of St. John, New Brunswick, along with American company Omega Protein, Alpha VesselCo Holdings LLC, and others are facing a $2 billion lawsuit over claims that the company violated the American Fisheries Act (AFA) of 1998 and the Jones Act of 1920. Under these laws,... Read More »
Canned Tuna Giants Settle Price-Fixing Claims for Over $216 Million
StarKist, Bumble Bee Foods, and their parent companies have agreed to pay more than $216 million to resolve claims that they colluded to inflate prices for canned tuna, following years of litigation and federal investigations. The settlements, approved by U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego on Friday, mark a significant resolution to a sprawling antitrust case involving the country’s largest tuna producers.
The case involves two major settlements addressing allegations of price-fixing in the canned tuna industry between 2011 and 2015. The first settlement pertains to a class of consumers across the United States who accused StarKist’s parent company Dongwon Industries, Bumble Bee Foods, and their private equity owner Lion Capital of colluding to overcharge for canned tuna products. This settlement awards $130 million to the consumer class. When combined with a prior $22.2 million settlement with Chicken of the Sea and its parent company Thai Union Group, the total payout to consumers reaches $152.2 million.
The second settlement addresses claims brought by hundreds of grocery distributors and national retailers, including Olean Wholesale Grocery Cooperative, Pacific Groservice Inc. (doing business as PITCO Foods), and Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co. These plaintiffs will collectively receive $64.7 million, resolving their allegations that the companies engaged in anti-competitive practices to fix tuna prices.
The legal saga dates back to 2015, when Olean Wholesale Grocery Cooperative filed a class-action lawsuit in San Diego federal court. Dozens of similar lawsuits were later consolidated in the same court, alleging that the three largest canned tuna companies — StarKist, Bumble Bee, and Chicken of the Sea — colluded to fix prices, violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Together, the companies controlled 73% of the U.S. canned tuna market, with Bumble Bee holding 29%, StarKist 25.3%, and Chicken of the Sea 18.4%, according to the complaint.
In 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division intervened, launching a federal grand jury investigation in California. This led to Bumble Bee pleading guilty to criminal price-fixing charges in 2017, further bolstering the civil litigation claims.
Related Articles
Big box retailer Costco lost its bid to dismiss a lawsuit alleging the company falsely advertises its canned tuna as “dolphin safe.” A proposed class action claims Costco’s tuna is acquired via fishing methods that harm and kill dolphins. A federal court in San Francisco recently rejected Costco’s motion to... Read More »
A lawsuit brought against Subway, a food retailer with over 27,000 US stores, alleging their tuna sandwiches intentionally misleads consumers since the ingredients are not 100 percent tuna, is now headed to court. Federal US District Judge Jon Tiger of California ruled that Subway’s recent request to dismiss this lawsuit... Read More »
Earlier this month, notices were sent out to Blue Cross Blue Shield subscribers notifying them of a settlement reached in a class-action suit that dated back to 2014. Although there seems to have been some confusion as to the veracity of the notices, they’re quite real. The settlement brings to... Read More »