According to AP News, Iowa abortion providers have decided to drop their lawsuit challenging the state's stringent abortion law. This move comes after the Iowa Supreme Court upheld a law banning most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, a period before many women even know they are pregnant. The... Read More »
Federal Appeals Court Declines to Rehear Case for Abortion Restrictions in Arkansas
On December 15, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied a request to rehear a decision that puts tighter restrictions on abortions in Arkansas.
The request was filed by the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights and was done so in an effort to block new restrictions on abortion that both organizations deem would be detrimental if they were to go into effect.
Four of the new restrictions at the center of the controversy include the following:
- There will be a ban on abortion after 14 weeks of pregnancy.
- Patient confidentiality will be eliminated because parents, partners, and other family members of the patient will be notified of an abortion that takes place.
- Health care workers will now be required to report teenage abortions to local police. The state crime lab will also be legally allowed to hold the patient's medical and personal information.
- Physicians will be allowed to request an array of medical records without needing medical justification for doing so. With this new medical overreach, physician-patient confidentiality will be violated, and there is the potential that access to an abortion will be delayed or blocked because of this.
Without any court intervention, these new laws could go into effect as early as December 22. As a last-minute attempt to keep the new regulations from going into effect, the ACLU and the Center for Reproductive Rights filed for emergency relief on December 21.
These new restrictive laws are just four of the already 480 current abortion-related laws that limit access to abortions or put tighter restrictions on getting an abortion in the state.
The executive director of the Arkansas ACLU, Holly Dickson, says of the new restrictions, "These extreme bans and restrictions would push abortion care out of reach to many who need it and brazenly intrude on people's most personal medical decisions. While we're disappointed the Eighth Circuit declined to rehear the case, this fight is not over. The people of Arkansas have a constitutional right to control their own lives and make their own medical decisions, and we'll never stop fighting to protect it."
Ruth Harlow, the senior staff attorney for the ACLU’s Reproductive Freed project, echos the same frustration in her statement: “These Arkansas laws represent the worst motives of anti-abortion politicians: to shame, stigmatize, and humiliate abortion patients, and to make abortion care difficult if not impossible to access. While we’re disappointed with this order from the Eighth Circuit, we’re not backing down — this fight is nowhere near over. To the state of Arkansas: We’ll see you back in court.”
Abortion in Arkansas
Arkansas remains one of the most restrictive states for abortions to take place in. As of 2017, there were only four facilities that provided abortions, and three of those were clinics. As of September 2020, there has been an increase in restrictions for patients who were in need of an abortion. Some of these restrictions include the following:
- Anyone under the age of 18 must have parental or guardian consent before receiving an abortion.
- Public funding for an abortion is an option only in life and death cases.
- Abortion clinics must undergo rigorous, unnecessary, and burdensome standards regarding the facility, equipment used, and even staffing.
- Any health plans that are offered under the state's health exchange through the Affordable Care Act can cover abortions only if the pregnancy is life-threatening or was the result of rape or incest.
Related Articles
On Friday, the Iowa Supreme Court, made up mostly of Republican appointees, reversed an earlier ruling guaranteeing the right to abortion under the state’s constitution. Under this new decision, if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, Iowa would then have an easier, legal pathway to ban the procedure throughout... Read More »
Ever since the Supreme Court recognized a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion in its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade and 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey decisions, states have been chipping away at that right by enacting increasingly stringent pre-viability restrictions. Now Mississippi has decided to stop chipping... Read More »
Arizona passed an extensive anti-abortion bill into law on April 28, 2021, placing new restrictions in terms of abortions on medical providers, state universities, and the use of public funds. After signing Senate Bill 1457, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey stated, "we will continue to prioritize protecting life in our preborn... Read More »