Nov 24, 2024

Federal Appeals Court Rules Ed Sheeran’s “Thinking Out Loud” Does Not Infringe Marvin Gaye’s “Let’s Get It On”

by Bridget Luckey | Nov 03, 2024
Ed Sheeran performing on stage with his guitar. Photo Source: Getty Images by Erika Goldring via rollingstone.com

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled on Friday that Ed Sheeran’s hit “Thinking Out Loud” did not infringe upon the copyright of Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On.” The court determined that the musical elements were too generic to warrant exclusive ownership, dismissing the claim brought by Structured Asset Sales (SAS), a company with a partial stake in the rights to Gaye's song.

The lawsuit by SAS had claimed that Sheeran’s track unlawfully copied structural elements from “Let’s Get It On,” particularly its chord progression and rhythm. However, the judges pointed out that these components had been used in other songs predating Gaye’s work, including “Georgy Girl” by The Seekers and “Since I Lost My Baby” by The Temptations, reinforcing their argument that such elements are common in popular music.

The appeals court agreed with a previous lower court ruling that Sheeran’s song, co-written with Amy Wadge and reached No. 2 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 2014, shared only “fundamental musical building blocks” with Gaye’s composition. The panel of judges stressed that copyright protection does not extend to basic musical elements such as common chord progressions and rhythms, which appear frequently across musical genres.

“The four-chord progression at issue—ubiquitous in pop music—even coupled with a syncopated harmonic rhythm, is too well-explored to meet the originality threshold that copyright law demands,” the Second Circuit stated. The court further emphasized that “overprotecting such basic elements would threaten to stifle creativity and undermine the purpose of copyright law.”

This decision follows a jury trial in a related case brought by the family of Ed Townsend, Gaye’s co-writer. That trial concluded last year with a jury ruling in favor of Sheeran, finding no infringement.

Despite this legal win, Sheeran is not yet free of litigation over the song. SAS has another ongoing lawsuit against him, which argues for broader copyright protection related to the sound recording of “Let’s Get It On” rather than just its sheet music. That case is currently on hold.

In a statement to Billboard, SAS owner David Pullman criticized the Second Circuit’s decision, arguing it overlooked the broader implications of copyright law and relied too narrowly on specific examples. However, Sheeran’s attorney, Donald Zakarin, expressed satisfaction with the outcome, stating, “This ruling is consistent with the jury’s rejection of any claim of infringement in the [earlier] case, finding that Ed and Amy independently created ‘Thinking Out Loud.’”

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Bridget Luckey
Bridget Luckey
Bridget studied Communications and Marketing at California State University, Long Beach. She also has experience in the live music events industry, which has allowed her to travel to festivals around the world. During this period, she acquired valuable expertise in branding, marketing, event planning, and public relations.

Related Articles

Mick Jagger and Keith Richards performing on stage.
Rolling Stones Dodge Copyright Lawsuit Due to Jurisdictional Issues

On Wednesday, October 18th, a federal judge in Louisiana dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Rolling Stones members Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. The lawsuit, filed by Spanish songwriter Sergio Garcia Fernandez, who goes by the stage name Angelslang, alleged that the iconic rock band's 2020 single "Living in a... Read More »

Katy Perry performing on stage, wearing a sparkling outfit decorated with colorful elements.
Katy Perry Did Not Steal Song Elements from Christian Hip-Hop Artists

Copyright law protects only original authorship. A group of Christian hip-hop artists sued pop star Katy Perry, claiming one of her songs infringed on their copyright. They were awarded a multi-million dollar judgment. Perry appealed. The district court found no original elements or arrangement in the hip-hop song, and the... Read More »