Skip to main content
Editions

Florida Restaurant Group Sues Google for ‘Hijacking’ Customer Orders from Restaurants

by Nadia El-Yaouti | Mar 23, 2022
A person using a smartphone with the Google homepage displayed on a laptop in the background. Photo Source: Adobe Stock Image

A Florida restaurant group is suing Google over allegations that the tech giant used “bait-and-switch tactics” to capture customer orders that would have otherwise gone through the restaurant directly.

The lawsuit takes issue with Google’s “order online” button. When users click this button, instead of being directed to the restaurant landing page or another page authorized by the restaurant, users are redirected to a page on Google’s interface. Because users stay on the Google interface, they receive ordering options that allow the customer to place their order using several third-party options including GrubHub and DoorDash. The Google interface allows users to place their order through the website as well; however, the link to the restaurant is a generic “website” button.

The complaint explains, "Google purposefully designed its websites to appear to the user to be offered, sponsored, and approved by the restaurant, when they are not -- a tactic, no doubt, employed by Google to increase orders and clicks.”

The lawsuit claims that Google’s “order online” button is deceptive because it appears as though the restaurant has authorized or sponsored it. Instead, by selling the restaurant's products without permission, these third-party services are taking away a commission from the participating restaurants, commissions which are as high as 15 to 30% in most cases.

When users click on the button, they stay on the Google interface but are routed to third-party providers according to the lawsuit. Because of this, third-party delivery options may come with additional fees that the restaurant wouldn’t ordinarily charge. “A restaurant’s motivation to partner with a Delivery Provider is almost never to make a profit on orders received from the Delivery provider,” the complaint reads. “Rather, a restaurant’s usual goal is to capture new customers that may later place orders with the restaurant outside of the Delivery Providers’ expensive platforms.”

The restaurant group contends that Google’s “Order Online” button is essentially an “unauthorized online storefront -- one owned and controlled by Google -- wherein consumers can place orders for the restaurant’s products, all under the restaurant’s trade name.” The group suggests that the button feature a more appropriate label such as “Google’s Unauthorized Buying Service.”

Google spokesperson Ashley Thompson shared that the tech company stands behind its business practices. Thompson called the restaurant’s complaint about the “Order Online" button a “mischaracterization” and that the group plans to “vigorously” defend itself from the restaurant group’s claims.

Thompson shared with the online magazine The Verge, “We provide tools for merchants to indicate whether they support online orders or prefer a specific provider, including their own ordering website. We do not receive any compensation for orders or integrations with this feature.”

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Nadia El-Yaouti
Nadia El-Yaouti is a postgraduate from James Madison University, where she studied English and Education. Residing in Central Virginia with her husband and two young daughters, she balances her workaholic tendencies with a passion for travel, exploring the world with her family.

Related Articles

Laptop on a table displays the Amazon logo with a blue shopping cart icon against a blurred store background.
Amazon Sued by FTC, 22 States Over Alleged $20 Billion Ad Overcharges

Amazon was sued Monday by the Federal Trade Commission and 22 states over allegations that it secretly changed how its advertising auctions set prices and overcharged about 1.2 million U.S. advertisers by more than $20 billion.Filed August 31 in federal court in Washington state, the lawsuit claims Amazon altered the... Read More »

A DoorDash delivery person approaching a front door while carrying a red insulated delivery bag.
DoorDash Hit With Class Action Complaints Over RoboCalls

In a recent opinion crossing ideological lines, the Supreme Court stated at least one incontrovertible fact: “Americans passionately disagree about many things. But they are largely united in their disdain for robocalls.” An annoyed customer pointed out the Court’s wisdom in a class action complaint filed in the Northern District... Read More »

Exterior view of the Google headquarters building with the company logo prominently displayed.
Lawsuit Accuses Google of Systemic Bias Against Black Employees

A complaint filed in federal court in San Jose, California, accuses tech giant Google of systemic bias against Black employees. The lawsuit was filed by former employee April Curley. The complaint details that Curley, who is a Black woman, was hired on for an entry-level position despite having over five... Read More »

Search Law Commentary

Subscribe to Newsletter