Nov 22, 2024

Hollywood Studios Win Piracy Battle Against PrimeWire

by Christopher Hazlehurst | May 09, 2022
Logo of the streaming website PrimeWire displayed on a smartphone with earphones, set against a colorful keyboard backdrop. Photo Source: Adobe Stock Image

The battle between intellectual property owners and software piracy is as old as the internet. Streaming websites and peer-to-peer file sharing applications such as Napster, LimeWire, Kazaa, and DC++ have allowed consumers to acquire music, television shows, video games, movies, and other content for free, to the chagrin of movie studios, music labels, and television networks. Many of these services have been taken down over the years--the law has been fairly consistent in labeling unlicensed streaming or file-sharing as copyright infringement--but new forms of software piracy continue to arise. Several Hollywood studios and their “enemy of my enemy is my friend” ally Netflix recently won another huge battle against PrimeWire, one of the more popular unauthorized streaming websites to come about in recent years.

In December 2021, Paramount, Netflix, Columbia, Disney, Universal, and Warner filed a lawsuit against PrimeWire alleging copyright infringement. PrimeWire is a streaming website that provided links to stream a large library of movies and TV shows (without the consent of the studios, of course). The plaintiffs obtained a preliminary injunction to force PrimeWire to stop infringing their copyrights.

The complaint alleges direct infringement as well as “contributory infringement” and “induced infringement.” Direct infringement is obvious: As alleged, PrimeWire made unauthorized reproductions of the plaintiffs’ copyrighted works. They copied the videos and streamed them. The other forms of infringement are a bit more nuanced.

The plaintiffs claim PrimeWire committed induced infringement by curating third-party streaming links, providing detailed instructions for rating and streaming the works, and by generally encouraging those third parties to infringe. PrimeWire also committed “contributory” infringement by materially contributing to third-party acts of infringement--namely, by moderating third-party links to pirated works, advising users on the use of VPNs and other IP-masking tools, and providing the means to connect unauthorized reproducers with eager end-users. In the copyright world, these charges are a lot like aiding and abetting or conspiracy to commit infringement.

On April 20, 2022, the studios won a huge legal victory against PrimeWire, in large part because PrimeWire neglected to actually show up. PrimeWire responded to the enforcement action by switching domains and removing all links to pirated content. They also promised to introduce upload filters to stop pirated content from appearing on the site. PrimeWire did not, however, formally respond to the complaint in court. PrimeWire communicated directly with the studios’ legal team several times, via anonymous emails, arguing that they had long since stopped distributing pirated content, but they did not file an answer in court.

Because PrimeWire failed to file an answer or otherwise defend itself in court, the plaintiffs moved for default judgment on the issue of liability. The court found that the plaintiffs had stated a proper case for copyright infringement and satisfied the other basic requirements for default judgment. The court granted the plaintiffs a permanent injunction preventing PrimeWire from unauthorized distribution of their works in the future, either directly or by facilitating piracy at the hands of third parties.

The court not only granted judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of liability and the injunction--the court also agreed to transfer the operation of PrimeWire’s website to the plaintiffs. The court agreed that such a transfer of control is appropriate to prevent future copyright infringement. The plaintiffs were also granted leave to conduct discovery in order to gather proof on the issue of damages, which will be decided later.

Share This Article

If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network.

Christopher Hazlehurst
Christopher Hazlehurst
Christopher Hazlehurst is a graduate of Columbia Law School, where he also served as Editor of the Columbia Law Review. Throughout his legal career, he has navigated a diverse array of intricate commercial litigation and investigations involving white-collar crime and regulatory issues. Simultaneously, he maintains a strong commitment to public interest cases nationwide. Presently, he holds a license to practice law in California.

Related Articles

A pilot giving a thumbs-up in the cockpit of a fighter jet with an American flag in the background.
Paramount Secures Victory in 'Top Gun' Copyright Battle

Paramount Pictures has won a recent copyright lawsuit initiated by the heirs of the author of a 1983 magazine story that served as inspiration for the original Top Gun film. The plaintiffs, Shosh and Yuval Yonay, filed the lawsuit against Paramount, alleging that the studio proceeded with the development of... Read More »

A person holds a laptop in front of a large wall displaying multiple digital screens showcasing various video content.
3 Men Indicted for Nationwide Illegal Cable TV Streaming Service

Three men in different states have been indicted for a nationwide copyrighted media theft scheme that lined their pockets with a combined $30 million. Authorities named Bill Omar Carrasquillo, 35, of New Jersey, Jesse Gonzales, 42, of California, and Michael Barone, 36, New York, as the men behind the cable... Read More »