Hip hop mogul and business leader Jay-Z, whose real name is Shawn Carter, has been named in a refiled lawsuit that directly connects him to bombshell allegations made earlier this year against music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs. This lawsuit accuses Carter of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl in 2000. The... Read More »
Jay-Z Files Lawsuit After Hip Hop Photographer ‘Exploited’ the Rapper’s Image and Likeness.
Grammy award-winning Superstar Jay-Z is suing popular hip hop photographer Jonathan Mannion for selling iconic images and prints of the rapper. According to the lawsuit, Mannion is profiting off the image and likeness of the rapper without Jay-Z’s consent.
Mannion first worked with Jay-Z after he photographed the cover of his debut album “Reasonable Doubt” which was released in 1996. Along with working with Jay-Z, whose legal name is Shawn Carter, Mannion has worked with many other iconic performers. Carter alleges that Mannion has made thousands of dollars off of selling prints without the rapper’s consent.
According to legal documents obtained by pop culture magazine Vulture, “Jay-Z never gave Mannion permission to resell any of the images.” The complaint goes on to add, “Nor did Jay-Z authorize Mannion to use his name, likeness, identity, or persona for any purpose.”
The lawsuit goes on to allege that Mannion was using the rapper’s images on the homepage of his website in order to draw in sales. The suit explains, Mannion “prominently displays a photograph of Jay-Z” and “displays Jay-Z’s name… above other well-known artists that Mannion has photographed.”
Official documents also indicated that the rapper spoke with Mannion before the lawsuit was filed, asking him to stop selling prints of the rapper. According to several reports, Mannion declined the request and instead “demanded that Jay-Z pay him tens of millions of dollars to put an end to Mannion’s use of Jay-Z’s likeness.”
Photo Source: Jay-Z and Jonathan Mannion (Instagram @jonathanmannion) Carter’s lawsuit brings forward two claims against the photographer. The first is that Mannion violated the California Civil Code by “misappropriating and using for commercial purposes Jay-Z’s name, likeness, identity, and persona” without seeking permission first. The second claim is that Mannion is violating California’s common law that addresses the rights of publicity.
In his lawsuit, Carter is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction that would put a stop to Mannion’s use of the rapper’s likeness as well as unspecified damages.
Mannion’s defense is pushing forward with claims of First Amendment protections. His attorney shared in a statement regarding the lawsuit,
“Mr. Mannion has created iconic images of Mr. Carter over the years, and is proud that these images have helped to define the artist that Jay-Z is today. Mr. Mannion has the utmost respect for Mr. Carter and his body of work, and expects that Mr. Carter would similarly respect the rights of artists and creators who have helped him achieve the heights to which he has ascended. We are confident that the First Amendment protects Mr. Mannion’s right to sell fine art prints of his copyrighted works, and will review the complaint and respond in due course.”
Related Articles
Renowned hip-hop artist and producer Madlib is facing legal action over the unauthorized use of the animated character "Lord Quas." The lawsuit, filed by artist Keith Griego, alleges that Lord Quas was created specifically for the cover of Madlib's 1999 single "Microphone Mathematics." Griego claims that Madlib has since used... Read More »
In a notable copyright infringement case, rapper Cam’ron, legally known as Cameron Giles, and his company Dipset Couture have been ordered by a federal judge to compensate photographer Djamilla Cochran more than $50,000. The legal action stemmed from Cam’ron's unauthorized use of Cochran’s photograph, which captures the iconic image of... Read More »
After posting a photo of herself on Instagram, actress and musician Miley Cyrus was sued by the paparazzo who took the picture. Just one month later, the parties reached a settlement. Although the case quickly settled, the allegations raise an interesting legal issue: How much do you actually own your... Read More »