OpenAI, the artificial intelligence research lab, has publicly responded to Elon Musk's recent lawsuit with a detailed blog post, including emails that suggest Musk was supportive of the organization's shift towards a for-profit model. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI, initiated legal action against the startup, accusing it of deviating from its foundational goal of developing AI for the greater good in favor of profit-driven motives through its partnership with Microsoft.

In a striking revelation, OpenAI's leadership, including Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever, disclosed communications indicating Musk's prior approval of the for-profit transition and his proposals for a merger with Tesla, which he envisioned as a "cash cow" for OpenAI. The blog post aims to dismiss Musk's claims, portraying them as contradictory to his earlier positions and involvement in strategic discussions.

OpenAI's narrative highlights a pivotal moment in 2017 when the organization contemplated a for-profit structure to sustain the ambitious development of artificial general intelligence (AGI). Contrary to Musk's lawsuit assertions, the disclosed emails reveal his active participation in these discussions, even suggesting a closer integration with Tesla to leverage its financial resources.

The disclosed correspondence also touches on Musk's agreement with the notion that not all of OpenAI's technologies, especially those nearing AGI, needed to be openly shared. This stance aligns with a strategic pivot from OpenAI's initial open-source ethos to a more guarded approach as it advanced closer to significant AI breakthroughs.

Musk's lawsuit and subsequent public comments, including a critical tweet about OpenAI's transparency, have sparked a broader debate on the ethical and strategic directions of AI development. OpenAI's defense points to Musk's changing stance and highlights the complexities of balancing open-source principles with the practicalities of funding cutting-edge AI research.