In a legal battle over rock 'n' roll memorabilia, three men face charges in a New York courtroom for allegedly attempting to sell original manuscripts of the Eagles' iconic song "Hotel California" without proper ownership rights. The defendants, rare-book dealer Glenn Horowitz, former Rock & Roll Hall of Fame curator Craig Inciardi, and memorabilia seller Edward Kosinski, have entered not guilty pleas to charges stemming from their efforts to commercialize handwritten lyrics of a song that has etched its place in music history.

The trial, which does not involve a jury, pivots on the accusation that the trio conspired to sell the drafts penned by Don Henley and Glenn Frey despite warnings from Henley that the items were stolen. The Manhattan District Attorney's office asserts that the defendants engaged in a scheme to muddy the origins of these documents, which include lyrics to other Eagles hits, to facilitate their sale.

This case is a rarity in the realm of collectible disputes, which are often settled out of the public eye or through civil litigation. The decision to prosecute signals the high stakes involved when dealing with artifacts of significant cultural and historical value. Henley, a founding member of the Eagles, is slated to provide testimony, offering a rare glimpse into the band's songwriting process and the tumultuous era that produced some of rock's most enduring anthems.

At the heart of the controversy are over 80 pages of draft lyrics from the Eagles' 1976 album "Hotel California," celebrated for its evocative imagery and haunting commentary on the American dream. The prosecution will argue that the documents, described by Eagles manager Irving Azoff as "irreplaceable pieces of musical history," were illicitly obtained and sold, with the defendants fully aware of their questionable provenance.

The defense, however, maintains the manuscripts were legitimately acquired from writer Ed Sanders, who had been working on an authorized biography of the band. They contend that Henley's claims of theft lack substantiation and that the documents' journey from Sanders to the accused does not constitute a crime.

It is anticipated that the trial will delve into the complex dynamics of copyright, ownership, and the legal protections afforded to artists and their works. This case raises questions about the responsibilities of collectors and dealers in the art and memorabilia market, particularly when handling items of significant cultural importance.

The case against Horowitz, Inciardi, and Kosinski not only challenges the trio's actions but also puts a spotlight on the broader issue of how the law navigates the murky waters of art, ownership, and copyright.