All eyes are on the Supreme Court after oral arguments ended yesterday in a case requiring the justices to consider whether Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors violates the equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The case of US v Skrmetti was first brought... Read More »
Sixth Circuit Upholds Tennessee Law Barring Transgender Birth Certificate Amendments
The Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Tennessee statute that prohibits transgender individuals from changing the sex listed on their birth certificates. The ruling, delivered on Friday, dismissed constitutional challenges based on equal protection and due process grounds.
A group of transgender women born in Tennessee brought the lawsuit in 2023, arguing that the law unfairly targets transgender people by preventing them from amending their birth certificates to reflect their gender identity. Under the statute, amendments to the sex designation on birth certificates are only permitted with proof of an error.
The plaintiffs, represented by LGBTQ+ rights organization Lambda Legal, contended that this restriction forces transgender individuals to disclose their transgender status when obtaining other identification documents. At oral arguments in May, attorney Omar Gonzalez-Pagan emphasized that the plaintiffs were not seeking to interfere with the state’s collection of vital records or statistics.
The three-judge panel upheld the statute by a 2-1 vote. U.S. Circuit Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton, writing for the majority, found that the collection of accurate vital statistics justified the requirement for birth certificates to reflect biological sex at birth. Sutton argued that the statute does not discriminate against transgender individuals because it treats all amendments to the sex designation uniformly.
“The law simply clarifies Tennessee’s use of ‘sex’ as speech about a biological and historical fact of birth and ensures a uniform practice across Tennessee birth certificates,” Sutton wrote. He added that the plaintiffs’ argument would lead to inconsistent standards where birth certificates reflect biological sex for some and gender identity for others.
Sutton noted that the policy predates medical diagnoses of gender dysphoria and that the plaintiffs could not show they belonged to a “suspect class” that would warrant heightened scrutiny under the Constitution. He suggested that transgender individuals should seek legislative solutions rather than constitutional mandates.
“For the fleeting present, eleven states provide individuals with this option, and all of them embraced these innovations through the democratic process in just the last seven years,” Sutton wrote. “The Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution do not suddenly require the remaining thirty-nine states, including Tennessee, to do the same.”
Sutton’s opinion was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Amul Thapar, also appointed by former President Donald Trump.
U.S. Circuit Judge Helene White, appointed by former President George W. Bush, dissented from the majority’s opinion. White argued that the policy is inherently discriminatory because it classifies individuals based on sex in determining eligibility for amended birth certificates.
Related Articles
On Monday (June 24), the Supreme Court agreed to hear the Biden Administration’s challenge to Tennessee’s controversial ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors. The justices, expected to hear arguments close to the November presidential election, will deliberate on the constitutionality of these bans, with the potential to impact similar... Read More »
A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit that pushed to reverse a Tennessee law prohibiting transgender individuals from changing the sex listed on their birth certificate. When the lawsuit was filed, Tennessee was one of only three states with such laws. The other states included Kansas and Ohio, both of which... Read More »
A federal lawsuit brought forward by a worker for the state of Tennessee and a former special education teacher accuses the state’s health benefit program of discriminating against transgender individuals. The lawsuit was filed by Gerda Zinner, 30, and Story VanNess, 38 on May 24, 2023. Both plaintiffs take issue... Read More »