The Supreme Court recently denied West Virginia’s request for emergency relief granting it authority to enforce a prohibition on trans athletes. In light of the Court’s decision, the state must wait for the Fourth Circuit to render a final appeal decision before enforcing the law. The case concerns a West... Read More »
Supreme Court Blocks Biden Administration’s Title IX Rule on Transgender Rights in Schools
The U.S. Supreme Court has dealt a setback to the Biden administration’s efforts to extend federal protections against discrimination to gay and transgender students. In a 6-3 ruling on Monday, the court temporarily blocked the implementation of new Title IX regulations in several states, creating widespread uncertainty for schools nationwide.
The ruling affects Kansas, Alaska, Utah, and Wyoming, among other states, putting the enforcement of the new rules on hold in a total of 14 states. The Biden administration’s revised Title IX regulations aimed to ensure that transgender students could use bathrooms and locker rooms matching their gender identity and mandated that school staff use preferred pronouns. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Education overstepped its authority by extending Title IX's antidiscrimination provisions to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
The new Title IX rule, set to take effect in August, was positioned to conflict with existing laws in numerous Republican-led states that require students to use facilities based on their birth sex. The rule’s implementation has been challenged by multiple lawsuits, reflecting a broader national debate over transgender rights in schools.
The majority of the justices concluded that the Department of Education exceeded its statutory authority. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “The department’s rule requires schools to prioritize the desires of transgender students over the privacy concerns of other students.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, emphasizing the court's duty to protect against discrimination. “This ruling undermines the core principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in our Constitution,” Sotomayor wrote.
The injunctions have left school administrators, students, and parents in a state of uncertainty regarding the application of federal law.
Education Secretary Miguel Cardona stated, “These regulations make it clear that everyone can access schools that are safe, welcoming, and that respect their rights.” Vanessa Harmoush, spokesperson for the Education Department, affirmed the administration's commitment to fighting for student protections despite the ruling.
Republican governors, such as Ron DeSantis of Florida and Greg Abbott of Texas, have vowed non-compliance with the federal rule. House Republicans have attempted to override the provisions through federal legislation, and numerous conservative legal groups have filed lawsuits challenging the rule.
The Supreme Court’s decision follows previous rulings that have limited the scope of federal regulatory power. The court's conservative majority has shown a pattern of skepticism towards expansive regulatory actions, often siding with arguments emphasizing states’ rights and limited federal overreach.
Related Articles
The Supreme Court refused to take a case from Virginia where a student was allowed to use a bathroom that matches his gender identity. Therefore, the decision of the lower court will stay as-is. Gavin Grimm started going to Gloucester High School in September 2014. Grimm was born a female... Read More »
One of the executive orders signed by President Biden on his first day in office effectively changed the face of girl’s athletics in the United States. It makes the appealing claim that: Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no... Read More »
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected an appeal that challenged an Oregon school district's policy regarding bathroom use and transgender student accommodations. The lawsuit, which was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court for review by a parent group, Parents for Privacy, was denied the request for appeal, automatically allowing the... Read More »